SMT. H. RAJANI JOSHI D/O LATE SRI NARAYANACHARYA v. SRI. G. KHALEEL SAB M,
CCC/100134/2025 · 2025-06-10
K V Aravind, R Devdas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47048 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47048 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7469-DB CCC No. 100134 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100134 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. H. RAJANI JOSHI D/O LATE SRI. NARAYANACHARYA, W/O SRI. ANIL KUMAR KULKARNI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
2.
H. GURURAJ S/O LATE SRI. NARYANACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. SOFTWARE ENGINEER,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT DOOR NO.35/1, NEAR BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, 2ND CROSS, SANGANKAL ROAD, BALLARI-583101. - COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. K RAGHAVENDRA RAO K AND Ms. V VIDYA, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
SRI. G. KHALEEL SAB M., THE COMMISSIONER, BALLARI CITY CORPORATION, BALLARI-583101.
2.
SRI. GURURAJ SAUDI, THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, ZONE-1, THE BALLARI CITY CORPORATION, BALLARI-583101. - ACCUSED (BY SRI. SHARANABASAVARAJ C., ADVOCATE FOR A1;
NOTICE TO A2 IS SERVED)
THIS CCC IS FILED U/S 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDERS PASSED BY THIS COURT IN W.P.
NO. 102859/2024 (LB-RES) DATED 16.05.2024 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ORDERS DATED 03.06.2024 AND 18.06.2024 AT ANNEXURE-C IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC.
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.06.11 11:35:10 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7469-DB CCC No. 100134 of 2025
THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the contempt petition.
The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly the contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE
Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE BVV, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 12