Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4704 (PNJ)

SUSHILA AND OTHERS v. RAJESH AND ANOTHER

FAO/977/2023 · 2026-04-22

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 244 Sushila an Rajesh and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU against the Accident C is no repr motion has times the 28.7.2025, behalf of a of appellan appellants the present time of the FAO-977-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR FAO No.977 of 2 Date of decision ila and others Versus sh and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellants. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present appeal has bee st the dismissal of their claim petit dent Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani vide A The appeal is of the year 202 o representation on behalf of appel on has not been issued so far. As per o s the matter has been taken up for .2025, however, on both dates, there lf of appellants. Even today there is n pellants. A bare reading of the abo s have exhibited an utterly casua resent litigation. It is to be appreciate of the Court has been expended in aff 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 77 of 2023 (O & M) cision :-22.04.2026 …..Appellants …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA s been filed by the claimants petition by the learned Motor ide Award dated 20.10.2022. ar 2023 and since inception there appellants, therefore, notice of s per order sheets, as many as two p for hearing i.e.27.5.2025 and , there was no representation on ere is no representation on behalf e above facts shows that the casual attitude in the pursuit of reciated that very valuable public in affording opportunities to the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 17.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellants have adopt neither the pursuing th option exce April 22, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo FAO-977-2023 (O & M) s in the interest of justice. On the adopted an utterly casual and careles er the appellants nor their counsel ing the present matter. Thus, this C n except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No 2 On the other hand, the appellants areless approach. It is clear that unsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other r non-prosecution. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 17.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document