[2025:RJ-JP:43945] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14092/2025 Santosh Kumar S/o Kailash Kumawat, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Babulal Kirana Store, Veer Hanuman Ji Ka Rasta , Chomu Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Prisons, Secretariat Jaipur 2. The Director General And Inspector General Of Prisons, Directorate Of Prisons, Ghat Gate,jaipur ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14169/2025 Kumher Singh S/o Nihal Singh Gurjar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Godhaban, Amaavara Bamanvaas, District Swaimadhopur ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Prisons, Secretariat Jaipur 2. The Director General And Inspector General Of Prisons, Directorate Of Prisons, Ghat Gate, Jaipur ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14223/2025 Rajendra Kumar S/o Bhagirath Mal, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Gram Kudan District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Prisons, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General And Inspector General Of Prisons, Directorate Of Prisons, Ghat Gate, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:43945] (2 of 3) [CW-14092/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avi Sharma Mr. Rajeev Sharma Mr. Rajkumar Suthar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 01/11/2025 1. Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 07.04.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15905/2024 titled as Dinesh Kumar Soni Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that these writ petitions be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petitions are disposed of in light of Dinesh Kumar Soni Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 6 weeks raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date [2025:RJ-JP:43945] (3 of 3) [CW-14092/2025] of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio as referred hereinabove is applicable upon the facts of the case, the benefits shall be extended to the petitioners within a period of 90 days. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petitions with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /40-42