[2025:RJ-JP:49237] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14823/2024 1. Harendra Singh Son Of Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Malah, Tehsil And District Bharatpur (Raj.) 2. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Vijjo Ram, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Shergarh, Tehsil Bayana District Bharatpur (Raj.) 3. Vijay Gochar Son Of Shri Dharmraj Gochar, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Ohari, Post Jaisthal, Tehsil Keshorai Patan, District Bundi (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its President. 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Rajasthan State Agriculture Managing Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondent to consider the candidature of petitioners under M.B.C. Non Creamy Layer, invite the petitioners for further selection process and given an appointment to petitioners on the post of Clerk Grade-II/ Junior Assistant under [2025:RJ-JP:49237] (2 of 3) [CW-14823/2024] advertisement dated 13.02.2024 in the larger interest of justice. (ii). Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 04.09.2019 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9455/2019 titled as Asif Ali Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. And judgment dated 01.11.2017 in DB Special Appeal Writ No.1700/2017 titled as Kavita Choudhary Vs. The Registrar and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of Asif Ali Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Kavita Choudhary Vs. The Registrar and Anr. (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Asif Ali Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Kavita Choudhary Vs. The Registrar and Anr. (supra), in case of deviation with a reasoned and [2025:RJ-JP:49237] (3 of 3) [CW-14823/2024] speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they will have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /212