Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47024 (RAJ)

BALU SINGH S/O MANGILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14986/2025 · 2025-11-28

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48452] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14497/2025 Shab Singh Alias Shiv Singh S/o Bhuwan Singh, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Rawatpura Police Station Aalot District Ratlam (M.p.) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.)) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14986/2025 Balu Singh S/o Mangilal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Gyasri Police Station Atar District Agar Malwa (Mp) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 28/11/2025 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused- applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 232/2025 registered at Police Station Dug District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8, 21, 29 NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that the applicant are in custody ever since 16.10.2025. It is further submitted that recovered quantity of the contraband is [2025:RJ-JP:48452] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14497/2025] 9.64 Gms, which is much lesser than the commercial quantity i.e. 250 Gms. Further, it is submitted that criminal antecedents are pertaining to the year 2015. Learned counsel has further submitted that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that accused- applicants are in custody ever since 16.10.2025; that recovered quantity of the contraband is lesser than the commercial quantity and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail applications of the accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants 1. Shab Singh Alias Shiv Singh S/o Bhuwan Singh & 2. Balu Singh S/o Mangilal, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /77-78