M/s.Sri.M.P.Balajee Stone Crusher, v. The Eastern power Distribution Company of Andhra
WP/2646/2015 · 2025-09-25
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47023 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47023 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010793742015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 2646/2015 Between:
1. M/S.SRI.M.P.BALAJEE STONE CRUSHER,,
REP. BY ITS PROPERITOR PAPPALA VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, S/O.NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O.PONDURU, RAJAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA, PRADESH LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, 2ND FLOOR, NEAR GURUDWAR P & T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY AND DISTRICT.
2. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA, PRADESH LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, G.T.ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DISTRICT.
3. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA, PRADESH LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, G.T.ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DISTRICT.
4. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, G.T.ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
There was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner on 18.08.2025. When this matter was again listed on 17.09.2025, there was no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner. Having taken note of the same, this Court had
directed to list this matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ on 25.09.2025. However, the Writ Petition has been listed today instead of 25.09.2025. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner.
2. In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to costs.
3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 26.09.2025 DSV
217
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 2646/2015
26.09.2025
DSV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 2646/2015 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE
ORDER Office Note
04. 26.09.2025 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is dismissed for Non prosecution. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV