VIDYA VIKAS MANDAL, LAKHANDUR, THR. PRESIDENT, SMT. KAVITA SADASHIV DONADKAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.
WP/2315/2025 · 2026-09-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4702 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4702 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 10-wp2315-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2315 OF 2025 (Vidya Vikas Mandal, Lakhandur, and Ors. Vs. State of Maharahstra and Ors.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R.G. Kavimandan, Advocate for the Petitioner (s). Mrs. K.H. Bhongde, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Adv. P.J. Vairagade h/f Neha M. Khune, Advocate for the Respondent No.3. Adv. Y.C. Ghodichar h/f N.A. Waghmare, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4.
CORAM :
ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
DATE :
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. We have perused the record and gone through the reliefs sought in the present writ petition. Having regard to the nature of the reliefs sought in the present petition, we find that the grievance raised by the petitioners can appropriately be considered and decided by the Grievance Committee constituted pursuant to the order dated 16.06.2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1775 of 2026. Since the reliefs sought by the petitioners squarely fall within the jurisdiction of the said Committee, we deem it appropriate to relegate the petitioners to avail the said remedy. Accordingly, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the Grievance Committee, which shall consider and decide the petitioners' grievance, as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All contentions of the parties are kept open.
4. In view of disposal of the writ petition, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. MPBalekar 2026:BHC-NAG:12322-DB
(2) 10-wp2315-2025
5. After passing the order, learned counsel for petitioners continued to make submissions and this is not the first such occasion. On earlier occasion, we have instructed learned counsel to maintain decorum.
6. At this stage, Mr. R. G. Kavimandan, learned counsel tendered apology, which we find to be lip service. We will accordingly consider the same, if it is tendered in writing. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) MPBalekar Signed by: Mr. Mrunal P. Balekar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 16/09/2026 19:58:35