[2025:RJ-JP:43541] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16739/2023 1. Ranjeet Singh S/o Kaptan Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Khemra Khurd, Post Sunari, Tehsil And District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2. Tarun Kumar Goyal S/o Prakash Goyal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gehanpal Mandir Wali Gali, Railway Station Road, Katra, Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer Headquarter -Deeg, District Deeg. 4. The District Education Officer Headquarter, Bharatpur. 5. Dan Singh S/o Rajaram, Through District Education Officer Headquarter- Deeg, District Deeg. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners with following prayer:- i. Respondents may kindly be directed to open the portal to the petitioners for filling up options for desired schools in District Bharatpur/Deeg and thereby allot District Bharatpur/Deeg as place of posting to the petitioner by considering their marks in the interview process as per the score cards. [2025:RJ-JP:43541] (2 of 3) [CW-16739/2023] ii. The action of the Respondents may kindly be declared illegal by which they have illegally open the portal for filling up option of schools for District Deeg to the candidate i.e. respondent No. 5 and issued appointment order who secured lesser marks than the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring judgment dated 20.10.2023 in case of Vikram Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ No.16275/2023 and connected matters submitted that clause in the order of appointment restricting the reliving of the petitioner(s) was quashed and set aside. He further submits that the judgment is approved by Hon’ble Division Bench on 05.03.2024 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.53/2024. He further submits that the writ petition be disposed of in accordance with judgment in case of Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 3. Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents and office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondents. 4. Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG submits that the judgment in case of Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) has attained finality and same has been implemented by the respondents. He submits that if the judgment is applicable on facts and circumstances of the case then the writ be disposed accordingly. 5. Having considered submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the material as placed on record, the writ petition preferred by petitioners is disposed of in terms of order dated 20.10.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition [2025:RJ-JP:43541] (3 of 3) [CW-16739/2023] No.16275/2023 Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. The clause in appointment order placing a restriction to relieve the petitioners is hereby quashed and set aside. 6. The respondents are directed to relieve the petitioners from their present position and permit them to join at the place(s), where they have been provided appointment by orders as mentioned in petition. 7. The instant writ petition and misc. application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /202