Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47019 (AP)

K PRABHAKAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2660/2019 · 2025-05-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVAT] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA / WRIT PETITION NO: 2660 OF 2019 / Between: K. Prabhakar, S/o Chitti Bapanaiah Chcwdary Aged about 64 years; worked as Special Category Staff Assistant/ Cashier, Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd Mangalagiri, Guntur District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture Cooperation Department, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd, Rep by its Chief Executive Officer Administrative Office, Brodipeta, Guntur, Guntur District. 3. The Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd, Rep by its Chairman, Administrative Office, Brodipeta. Guntur, Guntur District. 4. Koragallu Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, rep., by its Chief Executive Officer, Koragallu Village, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District-522503. 5. Andhra Pradesh State Co-Operative Bank Limited, rep., by its Managing Director, D.No. 27-29-28 NTR Sahakara Bhav^ Help Hospital Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada- 520 002. (Respondent Nos.4 and 5 impleaded as per Court Order dated 09.04.2025 vide I.A.No.1 of 2025 in WP No.2660 of 2019) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or orders more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the one respondents in not releasing the retirement benefits is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to pay the retirement benefits of the petitioner along with interest @18% per annum from the date of retirement of the petitioner. / lA NO: 1 OF 2niQ Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to issue representation dated 27-11-2018 for forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition. praying that in the circumstances m support of the petition, the High Court may be a direction to the respondents to consider the payment of retirement benefits Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. M. SHALINI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3:M/s. K.N. VIJAYA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: SRI S.BRAHMANANDA REDDY, SC FOR APCOB The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010057682019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI {Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2660/2019 Between: K Prabhakar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2.K N VIJAYALAXMI S.BRAHMANANDA REDDY SOMASANI (SCfor AP State Cooperative Bank) The Court made the following: ORDER: ...RESPONDENT(S) This Writ Petition is fiied under Articie 226 of Constitution of india with the following prayer: ^ direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the retirement benefits is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently 2 direct the respondents to pay the retirement benefits of the petitioner aiong with interest 18 percent per annum from the date of retirement of the petitioner and to pass such other order or orders ” 2. Heard Smt.M.Shalini, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Andhra Pradesh State Cooperative Bank. \ 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has received the retirement benefits. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the Bank would submit that the petitioner has received the retiral benefits and copy of acknowledgment is also placed on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the writ petition may be disposed of. 5. 6. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Cooperation Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd, Administrative Office, Brodipeta, Guntur, Guntur District. 3. The Chairman, Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd, Administrative Office, Brodipeta, Guntur, Guntur District. 1. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Koragallu Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Koragallu Village, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District-522503. 5. The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh State Co-Operative Bank Limited, D.No. 27-29-28 NTR Sahakara Bhavan, Help Hospital Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada- 520 002. 6. One CC to Smt. M. Shalini, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to M/s. K.N. Vijaya Lakshmi, Advocate[OPUC] 8. One CC to Sri Bhrahmananda Reddy, SC for APCOB[OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 10. Three CD Copies. ssb ✓ HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 \ \ ORDER WP.No.2660 of 2019 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS