[2025:RJ-JP:48286] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15735/2025 Sanjay Singh Sodha S/o Sh. Padam Singh Sodha, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Basni, Post Bairas Tehsil Laxmangarh, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan Pin 332311. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Addl. Director (Administration), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Medical Directorate, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priya Rastogi for Mr. Ankur Rastogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Prakhar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. The writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “a. by counting the services of the petitioner on the post of Nurse Grade-II from the date when the petitioner was given appointment against the vacant post of Nurse Grade II in lieu of PATEY VETAN, as the petitioner was given the vacant appointment against post of Nurse Grade II being an eligible candidate and as such, make payment of full salary for the period on which the petitioner had worked as a Nurse Grade II against the vacant post in addition with all due increments and other monetary benefits, perks, allowance etc. within a reasonable period or as per direction of this Hon'ble court. b. The writ petition filed by the petitioner before Hon'ble Court may be allowed as prayed for. [2025:RJ-JP:48286] (2 of 2) [CW-15735/2025] c. Any other appropriate order direction which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the facts and case may be granted in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that the facts of present case is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Hon’ble Court in the case of Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13563/2010, decided on 14.02.2020 and the present writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the aforesaid judgment. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents do not dispute the aforesaid ratio laid down in case of Kuldeep Singh (supra), if applicable on facts of present case. 4. Heard and perused the material placed on record. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of in the light of ratio as laid down in the case of Kuldeep Singh (supra). 6. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and if veracity of the judgment as referred hereinabove is applicable on the facts of the case then the petitioner is entitled for the benefits as decided by this Court in case of Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, (supra). 7. The writ petition and pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/341