Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47012 (KAR)

SRI. ARAVIND S/O MAHANTESH BHAJANTRI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/100036/2025 · 2025-03-18

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4925 CRL.RP No. 100036 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100036 OF 2025 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI ARAVIND S/O. MAHANTESH BHAJANTRI, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE DRIVER, R/O. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, Y.S. COLONY, TQ. DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD-580004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI S.L. MATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH ITS POLICE INSPECTOR VIDYAGIRI POLICE STATION, VIDYAGIRI, R/BY. ADDITIONAL S.P.P. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH-580001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (LAW AND ORDER) AND SPECIAL EXECUTIVE, MAGISTRATE, HUBBALLI, DHARWAD-580029. 3. THE TOWN POLICE STATION, HUMNABAD, THROUGH POLICE INSPECTOR, REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRAVEENA Y. DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397 AND 401 PF CR.P.C. (438 R/W. 442 OF BNSS 2023), SEEKING TO SET ASIDE AN ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE IN ¹JZï¦/«PÁzÀ/¹N¦/ºÀÄzsÁ/UÀr¥ÁgÀÄ/41/ 2024 DATED 13.01.2025. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.19 10:33:57 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4925 CRL.RP No. 100036 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) After addressing the arguments for some time, memo is filed by learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Memo reads as under: “Here in the advocate for petitioner submit as under: That the order passed u/s 55 of Police Act is appealable Hence, petitioner requests to withdraw the petition with liberty to file the appeal in the ends of justice.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Time spent before this Court in this revision petition shall be excluded for the period of competition of limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 8