APHC010447522013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 25392 OF 2013 Between: 1. Madakam Naganna Dora, S/o.Pandu Dora,, Occ:Cultivation, Caste:Koyadora, R/o. Ramuldevapuram Village, Gangavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Special Deputy Collector T W, Rampachodavaram, E. G. District. 2. The Tahsildar Gangavaram Agency Mandal, East Godavari District. 3. The Special Deputy Tahsildar, Gangavaram (Agency) Mandal, East Godavari District. 4. Kumjam Katanna Dora S/o Gangannadora, R/o. Ramuldevapuram Village, Gangavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in seeking to evict the petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.8.22 cents in SRK, J WP No.25392 of 2013 2 S.No.99 situated in Ramuldevapuram Village, Gangavaram Mandal, East Godavari District without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in violation of Art.14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to evict the petitioner from his land mentioned above without following due process of law in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE SRK, J WP No.25392 of 2013 3 The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in seeking to evict the petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.8.22 cents, situated in Survey No.99 of Ramuldevapuram Village, Gangavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, without following due process of law. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:03.12.2025 Nsr SRK, J WP No.25392 of 2013 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.25392 of 2013 Date:03.12.2025 Nsr