[2025:RJ-JP:10586] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1240/2025 Ranglal S/o Devkaran, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Neem Ka Kheda, P.s. Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.). (Accused Is Confined At District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1758/2025 1. Ramswaroop @ Fouru S/o Kalu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Neem Ka Kheda, P.s. Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.) (Accused Is Confined At District Jail Bundi) 2. Rameshwar S/o Kalu, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Neem Ka Kheda, P.s. Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.) (Accused Is Confined At District Jail Bundi) 3. Rajesh S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Neem Ka Kheda, P.s. Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.) (Accused Is Confined At District Jail Bundi) 4. Dayaram S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Neem Ka Kheda, P.s. Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.) (Accused Is Confined At District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish K Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG Mr. Govind Lal Choudhary, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/03/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.449/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 189(2) of BNS. Investigation is being conducted [2025:RJ-JP:10586] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1240/2025] for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 324(5), 109(1) & 189(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that there is omnibus allegations against the petitioners. It is submitted that allegation of causing life threatening injury is against other co-accused person. It is submitted that petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. It is submitted that petitioners are duly named in the FIR and they actively participated in commission of crime. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also considering the fact that life threatening injury is attributed to other co-accused person, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Ranglal S/o Devkaran, (2) Ramswaroop @ Fouru S/o Kalu, (3) Rameshwar S/o Kalu, (4) Rajesh S/o Ramswaroop, & (5) Dayaram S/o Ramswaroop, shall be released on bail provided each of them [2025:RJ-JP:10586] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1240/2025] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. Considering the criminal antecedents of petitioner Ranglal, it is directed that he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /368-369