p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 10066 of 2025 Abhinash Patra … Petitioner Mr. D.P. Dhal, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. P.K. Mallick, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 29.01.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is an application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with CT Case No. 1293 of 2025 arising out of Simulia PS Case No. 394 of 2025 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Soro for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.140(3)/ 74/76/115(2)/64(1)/62/351(3) of BNS, on the main allegation of forcibly abducting the victim and committing rape upon her. 3. Heard, Mr. Debi Prasad Dhal, learned Sr. counsel who is being assisted by Mr. P.K. Mallick, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. 4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence as alleged against the petitioner vis-a-vis p. 2 the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 19.08.2025 with submission of charge sheet in the meantime and taking into account the averments of the FIR together with the statement of the victim recorded U/S. 183 of BNSS and her medical report and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the Petitioner to bail, but subject to certain conditions. 5. Hence, the bail application of the Petitioner stands allowed and he is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:- (i) the petitioner shall not contact the victim or visit her house or village, (ii) the petitioner shall not threaten/ induce/influence/coerce any of the witnesses including the victim and her family members acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts before the Court and (iii) the petitioner shall report attendance before the Jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight p. 3 preferably on a Sunday in each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for six(06) months from the actual date of his release from the custody. The IIC of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated. This Court, however, reserves the liberty to the victim and the State to file appropriate application for cancellation of bail, if any of the conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. It is made clear that in such event for being approached for cancellation of bail, the learned trial Court would be at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Priyajit