Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 47009 (KAR)

THE DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER v. SHRI POKKA GANGA GOUDA SINCE DECESSED BY HIS LRS

WP/108009/2023 · 2025-03-24

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5364 WP No. 108009 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 108009 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: THE DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER, KARNATAKA AND GOA CIRCLE, T/56, ASSYE LINE, K. KAMARAJ ROAD BANGALORE-42. …PETITIONER (BY MRS. DIVYA ACHARI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VENKATESH.M.KHARVI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. 1(a) SHRI POKKA GANGA GOUDA SINCE DECESSED BY HIS LR’S, SMT. GOURI POKKA GOUDA AGE. 69 YEARS, 1(b) SHRI. PURUSHOTTAM POKKA GOUDA AGE. 44 YEARS, 1(c) SHRI JAIWANT POKKA GOUDA AGE. 41 YEARS, 1(d) SHRI SURESH POKKA GOUDA AGE. 40 YEARS, 1(e) SMT. KUSUM PANDURANG GOUDA AGE. 47 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O. SAKALBENA AVERSA, TAL. ANKOLA, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581 301. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5364 WP No. 108009 of 2023 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, PROJECT SEABIRD NAVAL BASE, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, UTTAR KANNADA-581 301. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Addl. Registrar (Judicial) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed before the Court on 12.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non- compliance of office objections’ on 24.03.2025. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5364 WP No. 108009 of 2023 order dated 12.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42