RAJBEER S/O SHRI KHUBIRAM v. PARSADI S/O SHRI BUDDASINGH
CRLMP/7250/2025 · 2025-12-17
Anil Kumar Upman
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47007 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 47007 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50966] (1 of 2) [CRLMP-7250/2025] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7250/2025 Rajbeer S/o Shri Khubiram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Lakhanpur, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Parsadi S/o Shri Buddasingh, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Vilage Biloth, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur Raj.
2. Khusi Enter Prises, Lakhanpur, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur Through Proprietor Rajbeer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghav Sharma with Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : ----- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 17/12/2025 Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS assailing the order dated 17.10.2025 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.4, Bharatpur whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 72 BNSS for converting the warrant of arrest into bailable warrant has been dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of unavoidable circumstances, he could not mark presence on the date fixed before learned trial court and, therefore, his bail bonds were forfeited and warrant of arrest was issued to ensure his presence. It is submitted that thereafter, he moved an application for converting warrant of arrest into bailable one but said
[2025:RJ-JP:50966] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7250/2025] application was dismissed by learned trial court vide order dated
17.10.2025. Hence, this petition has been filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner undertakes that in future, he will join the court proceedings on each and every date and will not remain absent without seeking leave of the court. It is submitted that petitioner is ready to deposit the fine amount under Section 491 BNSS. In view of above facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to dispose of this criminal misc. petition with the direction to the petitioner to appear before learned trial court on or before 24.12.2025 and submit his bail bonds. Petitioner is further directed to deposit the fine amount under Section 491 BNSS before the trial court and he will pay the cost of Rs.2100/- to the complainant on the date of his appearance. Upon furnishing of bail bonds, the trial court is directed to accept the same only after deposition of fine amount under Section 491 BNSS and aforesaid cost by the petitioner. With the aforesaid directions, this criminal misc. petition is
disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /56