1 2025:CGHC:52431 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12294 of 2025 1 - Vandana Tiwari D/o Shri Mahendra Kumar Sharma Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Sewar Tahsil Bilha, Bilaspur, C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shahnaz Ali W/o Shri Samsher Ali Aged About 45 Years R/o Uparpara Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Shamsher Ali S/o Late Nazeer Aged About 45 Years R/o Maharpara Manendragarh, District : Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Aaradhna Sharma D/o Shri Mahendra Sharma Aged About 34 Years R/o Ward No. 19 Kasturba Nagar Sindhi Colony, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Of Public Instructions School Education Department, Government Of C.G., Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector And District Mission Co-Ordinator Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector And District Mission Co-Ordinator Balrampur, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Rehabilitation Council Of India Through The Secretary, B-22, Qutub Institutional Area, New Delhi 110016 ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate. For State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. A.G. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 28/10 /2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of direction issued by Hon’ble the Supreme Court on 07.03.2025 in Writ Petition (S) (Civil) No. 132/2016 (Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & others Vs. Union of india & others) wherein following order has been passed:- “Further, in case of a person who was already working and teaching for the last many years, the Screening Committee ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.10.30 10:39:18 +0530 2 shall also be authorized consider relaxation of the age limit in appropriate cases. Let all of this be completed within a period of twelve weeks from today which will include the three weeks for the sanctioned posts which have to be identified. We make it absolutely clear that the benefits of pay scale will only be prospective and not retrospective i.e. from the date of their such appointment after selection. They will be appointed against the sanctioned posts and shall be given the pay-scale which is to be given on that post only after screening.” 2. The appropriate way to address a violation of direction issued by Hon’ble the Supreme Court order is by filing a contempt petition directly to the Court who has passed the order, rather than initiating a new case/writ petition in other court, as such the Court has jurisdiction to see compliance of direction issued by Hon’ble the Supreme Court through the writ petition. As such the instant writ petition is liable to be disposed of as not maintainable. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to the remedy available to him under the law. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun