[2025:RJ-JP:47198] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2794/2025 Lalchand Urf Lalsingh Urf Lal Badshah, Son Of Late Shri Ghasiram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dhani Khari Modi Tan Village Chirana Police Station Gothada, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Appellant Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Sunil Kumar Berwal Son Of Shri Ramdat Berwal, R/o Bas Ki Dhani Bagoriya Ki Dhani, Nawalgarh, Gothada, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2795/2025 Rahul Ufr Mohit Son Of Shri Ramsingh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village No. 22, Chirana Police Station Gothada, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Appellant Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Sunil Kumar Berwal Son Of Shri Ramdat Berwal, R/o Bas Ki Dhani Bagoriya Ki Dhani, Nawalgarh, Gothada, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. The instant appeals have been filed under Section 14A SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Amendment Act 2015 on behalf of the appellants, who are in custody in connection with FIR No. 0174/2024 Police Station Gothda for the offences under [2025:RJ-JP:47198] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-2794/2025] Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 307 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-appellants has submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the present matter. It is further submitted that the FIR has been lodged with a delay of two days. Learned counsel submits that five persons have been falsely implicated in the matter and the case is entirely fabricated. It is also submitted that the vehicle in question has already been recovered. 3. Upon perusal of the impugned order, it is observed that the appellants have strong criminal antecedents despite being only 20 years of age. It is further reflected from the order that the victim sustained multiple injuries, including one grievous injury. It is also noted that it has been alleged that one of the appellants urinated on the face of the victim, which is highly immoral act. 4. In view of the above, no interference is called for and the instant appeals are dismissed. 5. A copy of present order be placed in the connected appeal. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/224-225