MAHESH KUMAR AND ANR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR
CRLMP/4305/2016 · 2025-10-30
Anand Sharma
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46994 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46994 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43539] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4305/2016
1. Mahesh Kumar S/o Dhanna Ram, aged about 23 years, R/o Village Hamirpura Kalan, Post Samarathpura, District Sikar (Rajasthan)
2. Smt. Anju Kumari Jat W/o Mahesh Kumar D/o Anil kumar Jat, aged about 22 years, R/o Dhani Dangya Wali, Post Samarathpura, District Sikar (Rajasthan) presently R/o Village Hamirpura Kalan, Post Samarathpura, District Sikar (Rajasthan) ----Accused/Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan through PP
2. Rajkumar S/o Anil Kumar, aged about 24 years, R/o Dangya ki Dhani, Police Station, Kahndela, District Sikar (Rajasthan). ----Complainant/Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 30/10/2025
1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No. 266/2016 registered at Police Station Khandela, District Sikar for offences under Sections 363, 366, 368 of IPC.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegations leveled in the FIR were false as the petitioner No.1 never abducted sister of the complainant and rather petitioner No.1 and sister of complainant had performed marriage and living happily as husband and wife.
[2025:RJ-JP:43539] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4305/2016]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor, on the basis of factual report dated 15.05.2023, submits that after investigation, the fact with regard to solemnization of marriage by the petitioner No.1 with the sister of complainant (petitioner No.2) has been verified and thereafter, negative FR has been filed by the police before the learned Court below, which has been accepted on 22.11.2016.
4. The factual report dated 15.05.2023 is taken on record.
5. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the instant criminal misc. petition. Hence, the instant criminal misc. petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/52