Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46994 (PNJ)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/10882/2025 · 2025-07-21

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.125 CWP-10882-2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 Sunil Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present: Mr. Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 – Assistant Collector, Gharonda, Karnal to take a decision on the representation dated 19.08.2024 (Annexure P-2) made by the petitioner. (2) Learned State counsel has no objection if the petitioner’s above prayer is accepted. (3) Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the aforesaid representation made by the petitioner, by passing speaking order(s) and affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. JYOTI SHARMA 2025.07.25 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CWP-10882-2025 -2- (4) Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE July 21, 2025 Jyoti 1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2025.07.25 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh