Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46993 (CHH)

SMT. DIMPAL PATEL v. STEP FOR A NEW LIFE SOCIETY

CRMP/3772/2025 · 2025-12-14

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3772 of 2025 1 - Smt. Dimpal Patel W/o Shri Narsingh Patel Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Kesla, P.S. Balodabazar, Tahsil Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara (C.G.) Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Mahesh Arya, S/o Shri Tularam Arya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Fandwani Kapa, Post Fandwani, P.S. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Step For A New Life Society Through Partner, Sanjay Banjare S/o Shri C.P. Banjare, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Jarhabhata, Omnagar, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Step For A New Life Society Through Partner Rakesh Joshi S/o Shri Rajkumar Joshi, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Kesla, Tahsil And P.S. Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate For Respondent : Not noticed Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 15/12/2025 1. Heard. 2. Admit. HEERA LAL SAHU Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.12.15 16:36:35 +0530 2 3. The complainant/petitioner has filed this petition for extension of time for compliance of order passed by this Court. 4. Vide order dated 09.09.2025 passed in ACQA No. 490/2024, the appeal was disposed of in light of decision of the Supreme Court rendered in M/s. Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804 and the petitioner was directed to file an appeal within a period of 60 days from 09.09.2025 before the appropriate Court which was not complied with. 5. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that due to an inadvertent bona fide mistake and communication gap between the party and counsel, the Petitioner has failed to comply with the order of this Court dated 09.09.2025; therefore, it is requested that the application may be allowed and 30 days’ further time may be granted for compliance with the said order. 6. In view of above submission, the CRMP is allowed and the Petitioner is granted 30 days’ further time from today to file an appeal before the appropriate Court. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu