IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 RITU AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms. Harmeet Kaur Bhatia Mr. Sunil Kumar Rana, Advocate for Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 17.04.202 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner 17.04.2025 before the (Annexure P-5) but the same has not yet been considered and no action has He further submitted that at this stage, the appropriate directions are issued to Police, Panipat, District Panipat the petitioners and take IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: RITU AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Ms. Harmeet Kaur Bhatia, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Kumar Rana, Advocate for Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8 and to take action on dated 17.04.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Superintendent of Police, ) raising their grievances as mentioned but the same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. Panipat, District Panipat to decide the aforesaid representation filed by and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.3876 of 2025 Date of decision: 22.04.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for Mr. Sunil Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Panipat, District Panipat mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioners would be satisfied if respondent No. 2- Superintendent of decide the aforesaid representation filed by necessary action thereon. of the the s their representation has recently filed a representation on Panipat, District Panipat petition been taken thereon. satisfied if of decide the aforesaid representation filed by Jyoti 2025.04.22 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the pet commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 22.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.3876 of 2025 Notice of motion. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the pet commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 17.042.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.3876 of 2025 -2- Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana, who is present in Court, accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No urt, the paperbook be , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.04.22 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document