Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4699 (RAJ)

FAZROODIN S/O BADRUDDIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1188/2025 · 2025-03-11

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11330] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1188/2025 1. Fazroodin S/o Badruddin, R/o Pratap Colony, Near Devnarayan Mandir Rangpur Marg, Rangpur, Police Station Railway Colony Dist. Kota (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Confined In Dist. Jail Bundi) 2. Shahrukh S/o Farooq, R/o Musalman Basti Talab Gaon, Police Station Hindoli, Dist. Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Confined In Dist. Jail Bundi). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Bajaj For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.25/2024 registered at Police Station Namana, District Bundi for the offences under Section 379 of IPC and Sections 4 & 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate for which maximum punishment is three years. It is submitted that petitioners are in custody since 09.01.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:11330] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1188/2025] Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – (1) Fazroodin S/o Badruddin, & (2) Shahrukh S/o Farooq, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /414