APHC010264932021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15307/2021 Between: 1. V.RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. TIRUPATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC . AGRICULTURE, R/O. GUDURU VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDURU POLICE STATION, GUDURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. MR B VENKATANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDURU P.S., KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. E VENKATALAKSHMI, W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED . MAJOR, TAHSILDAR, GUDURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. TELUGU SUNKANNA, S/O HANUMANNA, AGE . MAJOR, R/O. GUDURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly that of the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 herein in trying to settle the Civil disputes between the petitioner and the 6th respondent at the behest of some vested interests in 6th 2 respondent who inflicted the pressures through his local political identities and depriving the petitioner of his personal liberty by calling him and threatening the petitioner that he would foist false cases, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents 2 to 4 herein not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any crime registered against him” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15307 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr