K. KAMALAKARA REDDY v. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER.
WP/5579/2003 · 2025-09-24
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46984 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46984 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010198902003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 5579/2003 Between:
1. K. KAMALAKARA REDDY, S/O K.RAMI REDDY R/O B.V.NAGAR MIAN ROAD., NEAR RAILWAY GATE., NELLORE-4, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, SATISH DAWAN SPACE CENTRE.,SHAR., SRI HARI KOTA-524 124, NELLORE DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPT.OF SPACE, ANTARIKSHA BHAVAN., BANGLORE-94. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondents in reserving the unreserved post i.e., post No.3, restricting to the candidates successfully undergone apprentice training in SDSC, SHAR, is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and also violation of Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India; and also consequently direct the first respondent to allow the petitioner for the interview/counselling and consider his case for the selection and appointment for the post No.3 i.e., Tradesman-A (Fitter) in SDSC, SHAR, Sriharikota, Nellore District. 2
IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 1851 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in W.P.M.P.No. 7334 of 2003 in W.P.No.
5579 of 2003 dt.3-4-2003. IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 7334 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner for interview/counselling for the post of Tradesman-A (Fitter) i.e., post No.3 in SDSC,SHAR, Sriharikota, Nellore District. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 3794 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 102414 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
A HARIPRASAD REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. RAJA SHEKAR RAO SALVAJI
2. DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE
3. GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
3
The Court made the following order:
Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 11.09.2025 and 11.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP
4
167 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5579 of 2003 Date: 25.09.2025
MP