- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5489 RPFC No. 100207 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100207 OF 2024 (-) BETWEEN: SHRI MOHAMMAD S/O. GOUS ABDUL RAISHIB MULLA @ KURNE, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. ANJANEYA NAGAR, SANKESHWAR ROAD, HUKKERI-591309. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. RAISA W/O. MOHAMMAD GOUS MULLA @ KURNE, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. JUSSAINSAB MOHAMMAD HANIF SAYYED, REVENUE COLONY, AUTO NAGAR, BELGAVI-590010. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT PRAYING TO THAT THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 04.10.2024 IN CRL. MISC.NO.149/2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BELAGAVI, MAY KINDLY BE ‘SET ASIDE’ BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5489 RPFC No. 100207 of 2024 ORAL ORDER This petition is filed by the respondent-husband in Crl.Misc.No.149/2018 challenging the order dated 04.10.2024 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Belagavi (for short “the Family Court”) granting maintenance to the petitioner- wife. 2. I have taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner herein (respondent-husband in Crl.Misc.No.149/2018) that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized during September 2012 and on account of incompatibility of relationship, the parties are residing separately. 3. Taking into account the finding recorded by the Family Court that the respondent herein is residing separately at Belagavi city and she has to take care of her health, the maintenance of ₹9,000/- per month to the respondent herein awarded by the Family Court is just and proper and does not call for interference by this Court in this petition. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5489 RPFC No. 100207 of 2024 4. In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE YAN CT-MCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5