Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46978 (AP)

Battraju Veeravenkat Satyavathi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6141/2020 · 2025-10-15

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010101622020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6141/2020 Between: 1. BATTRAJU VEERAVENKAT SATYAVATHI,, W/O EDUKONDALU, AGE 50 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLI, R/O KOCHERLA VILLAGE,KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. CHEBOINA LAKSHMI YOSODHA,, W/O NAGAMALLESWARARAO, AGE 48 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLI, R/O VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 3. CHEBOINA KRISHNA KUMAR, W/O RAMA KRISHNA, AGE 43 YEARS, R/O KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPART BUILDING,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. CHILAKALAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE THAHASILDAR MRO, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALIDINDI POLICE STATION, KALIDINDI, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6141/2020 BATTRAJU VEERAVENKAT SATYAVATHI,, W/O EDUKONDALU, AGE 50 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLI, R/O KOCHERLA VILLAGE,KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. CHEBOINA LAKSHMI YOSODHA,, W/O NAGAMALLESWARARAO, AGE 48 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLI, R/O VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. CHEBOINA KRISHNA KUMAR, W/O RAMA KRISHNA, AGE 43 YEARS, R/O KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. CHILAKALAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIWADA, KRISHNA THE THAHASILDAR MRO, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KALIDINDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALIDINDI POLICE STATION, KALIDINDI, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3233] SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN BATTRAJU VEERAVENKAT SATYAVATHI,, W/O EDUKONDALU, AGE 50 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLI, R/O KOCHERLA CHEBOINA LAKSHMI YOSODHA,, W/O NAGAMALLESWARARAO, AGE 48 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLI, R/O KOCHERLA CHEBOINA KRISHNA KUMAR, W/O RAMA KRISHNA, AGE 43 YEARS, R/O KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL MENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. CHILAKALAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIWADA, KRISHNA KALIDINDI MANDAL, KALIDINDI, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALIDINDI POLICE STATION, 2 BKM,J W.P.No.6141 of 2020 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a Writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents interfering with the peace full possession and enjoyment of an agricultural land to the extent of Ac.0.49 cts in R.S.No.43/13 of petitioners in Kocherla Village, Kalidindi Mandal, Krishna District, to distribute the plots under Navaratnalu Pedalandariki Illu Scheme, without notice and without following due process of law are illegal, arbitrary ,contrary to law and violation of provisions of Article 14 ,16,21 and 300(A) of constitution of India and principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above lands of petitioners without following due process of law IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners own Agriculrure lands to an extent of Ac.0.49 cents in R.S.No.43/13 in Kocherla Village, Kalidindi Mandal, Krishna District without following due process of Law. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 BKM,J W.P.No.6141 of 2020 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of an agricultural land to an extent of Ac.0.49 cents in R.S.No.43/13 of Kocherla Village, Kalidindi Mandal, Krishna District, to distribute the plots under Navaratnalu Pedalandariki Illu Scheme, without notice and without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 submits that the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.0.49 cents in R.S.No.43/13 of Kocherla Village, Kalidindi Mandal, Krishna District, strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose and if not already utilized the same for the above said welfare scheme of housing and if the petitioners are otherwise found to be in possession of the same, they shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioners, giving due opportunity, upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be 4 BKM,J W.P.No.6141 of 2020 taken on its own merits. Any dispossession from the subject land shall not be made except by following the due process of law. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 16.10.2025 MDP