205. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Karambir Singh @ Kala and another State of Haryana CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. under Section Sections 190, 191(3), 115(2), 118(2), 238 of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station 2. following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner Court had granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner asked them IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Karambir Singh @ Kala and another Versus State of Haryana HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Ms. Komal Rana, Advocate, for Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners are seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, in FIR No.151, dated 13.03.2025, under Sections 190, 191(3), 115(2), 118(2), 238 of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Shahabad, District Kurukshetra. On the last date of hearing i.e. 2 following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner to join investigation:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners, that petitioners have not been attributed any injury on the person of the injured except that they held the complainant injured by his arms while the co the index finger of the complainant IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20604-2025 Date of decision: 16.05.2025 .... Petitioners .... Respondent JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Ms. Komal Rana, Advocate, for , Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana. seeking the concession of anticipatory bail, in FIR No.151, dated 13.03.2025, under Sections 190, 191(3), 115(2), 118(2), 238 of BNS, 2023, registered at Shahabad, District Kurukshetra. of hearing i.e. 21.04.2025, while noticing the following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioners and the petitioners, inter alia, contends that petitioners have not been attributed any injury on the person of the injured except that they held the complainant- injured by his arms while the co-accused inflicted injuries on the index finger of the complainant.” , in FIR No.151, dated 13.03.2025, under Sections 190, 191(3), 115(2), 118(2), 238 of BNS, 2023, registered at while noticing the this and contends that petitioners have not been attributed any injury on the - accused inflicted injuries on SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.05.19 08:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-20604-2025 - 2 - 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of order dated 21.04.2025, petitioners have joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioners having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioners are not required for further investigation much less for their custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 21.04.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) of BNSS, 2023. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE May 16, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.05.19 08:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document