[2025:RJ-JP:49234] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12605/2024 Tejpal Singh, S/o Shri Rampal Jat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o- Village Dodhsar, Post Govindgarh, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Deputy Commissionerate Of Police (Headquarters), Jaipur City, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12607/2024 Mangal Singh, S/o Murlidhar, Aged About 46 Years, R/o- Patwari Ka Bas, Sri-Madhopur, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Deputy Commissionerate Of Police (Headquarters), Jaipur City, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petitions are preferred by petitioners with following prayer: (A) By issuing an appropriate writ, direction to the actions of the Respondents may be directed violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. [2025:RJ-JP:49234] (2 of 3) [CW-12605/2024] (B) By issuing an appropriate writ, order, or direction direct the Respondents to accord Retrospective Seniority, Notional Benefits, Selection Scale, and other consequential service benefits from the same date which is admissible and extended to the similarly situated persons. (C) By issuing an appropriate writ, order, ΟΙ direction direct the Respondents to pay regular salary and due arrears and other service benefits with appropriate interest rate. (D) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may kindly be passed in favor of the Petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 17.12.2012 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11973/2012 titled as Dara Singh Vs. State and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petitions be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petitions may be disposed of in light of Dara Singh Vs. State and Ors (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Dara Singh Vs. State and Ors. (supra), in case of [2025:RJ-JP:49234] (3 of 3) [CW-12605/2024] deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E- mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petitions with pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /208-209