Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46970 (ALL)

SACHIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/12366/2025 · 2025-05-06

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73367 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12366 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sachin Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Rathore,Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Avinash Chandra Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. List of fresh cases has been revised. No one is present on behalf of petitioner to press this petition though learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri A.C. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 4 are present. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition inter alia with the prayer to direct the respondent no. 2 to take appropriate action against the respondent no. 5 on the complaint made by the applicant under the provision of Section 95 (1)(G) of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act. 3. Considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 2. On the other hand, it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that the respondent No.2 will take a decision in the matter expeditiously. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Mainpuri to take a decision in the matter expeditiously, unless there is no legal impediment. 5. Needless to say that before taken any decision he will comply with the provision of Section 95 (1)(G) of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Arti Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad