KARTAR SINGH S/O SHRI NANDAN SINGH v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
CW/17056/2025 · 2025-11-19
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46969 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46969 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46773] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17056/2025 Kartar Singh S/o Shri Nandan Singh, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Ware House Road, Katra, Ward No. 30, Nadbai, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur.
2. The Superintending Engineer (P V S), Bharatpur.
3. The Assistant Engineer (P V S), Nadbai Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.R. Baisla For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 19/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to accept and allow the writ petition and further be pleased to revoke the suspension of petitioner which is malafide and not as per Principle
of
Natural
justice. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in faovur of the petitioner.”
[2025:RJ-JP:46773] (2 of 2) [CW-17056/2025]
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking
order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /314