Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46962 (KAR)

VISHAL S/O DEVADAS BILANA v. TEH STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/100837/2025 · 2025-03-17

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4814 CRL.P No. 100837 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100837 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. VISHAL S/O. DEVADAS BILANA, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC. PAINTER, R/O. SHIKKALAGAR TANDA KARWAR ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020. 2. KUSHAL S/O. DURAGAPPA VAJJANNAVAR, AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC. PAINTER, R/O. SHIKKALAGAR TANDA, KARWAR ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020. 3. SHRINATH @ SRINIVAS S/O. JAYARAJ DUNDI, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC. PLUMBING, R/O. SHIKKALAGAR TANDA, KARWAR ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020. 4. VISHAL S/O. GULAPPA DONI, AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC. CARPENTER, R/O. SHIKKALAGAR TANDA, KARWAR ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020. …PETITIONERS V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.18 11:14:28 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4814 CRL.P No. 100837 of 2025 (BY SRI NARAYAN V. YAJI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY OLD HUBBALLI POLICE STATION, HUBBALLI, DISTRICT: DHARWAD, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, O/O. ADVOCATE GENERAL, HIGH COURT BUILDING AT DHARWAD. 2. ASHOK S/O. BASAVARAJ NARAYANPUR, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC. LABOUR, R/O. NAVODAYA NAGAR, AMBEDKAR COLONY, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.GIRIJA S.HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1; R2-NOTICE SERVED) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S. 483 OF BNSS, SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.3, 4, 5 AND 6 ON BAIL IN OLD HUBBALLI POLICE CRIME NO.1/2025 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SECTIONS 109, 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2) (3) AND 190 OF BNS ACT AND SECTIONS 3(1)(r) AND 3(1)(s) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DHARWAD AND SPECIAL COURT, UNDER POCSO ACT AND SC AND ST (POA) ACT, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4814 CRL.P No. 100837 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. Memo reads as under: “During pendency of the above case, the 1st respondent police has filed charge sheet before the trail court. In view of the said fact, by reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the trail court seeking for regular bail, the above criminal petition may kindly be permitted to withdraw the petitioners. WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above case as withdrawn by reserving the liberty as prayed for, to meet the ends of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 17