Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4819 WP No. 106010 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 106010 OF 2016 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
TUSHAR S/O SHRIKANT KOLHAR, AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O VIVEKANANDA NAGAR VIDYAGIRI, DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY MIS. RUKMINI PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVAS.B.NAIK., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT DIST: BAGALKOT.
2.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT.
3.
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, NEW NO.3, (OLD NO.1630-A), ‘J’ BLOCK, 16TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR WEST, CHENNAI-600 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA FOR R1-2)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4819 WP No. 106010 of 2016
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Ms.Rukmini Patil., counsel on behalf of Sri.Srinivas B.Naik., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Ms.Rukmini Patil., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the counsel on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is placed on record.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4819 WP No. 106010 of 2016
The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 36