Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46938 (RAJ)

PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA SON OF AMARCHANDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15279/2025 · 2025-12-17

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51061] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13277/2025 Sagar Doltani Son Of Sri Hansanand Doltani, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 3/4 Khandu Colony, Police Station Rajtalab, District Banswara (Rajasthan) ( Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15279/2025 Pradeep Kumar Sharma Son Of Amarchandra Sharma, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 25, Bukalsar Bas, Sardar Shahar, Police Station, Sardar Shahar, District Churu, Rajasthan ( Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Shekhawat Mr. Vedant Sharma with Mr. Shivam Sharma & Mr. Harshit Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 17/12/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.56/2024 registered at Police Station SOG, District Jaipur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 420, 467, [2025:RJ-JP:51061] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13277/2025] 468, 471 & 120-B of I.P.C. and Section 3, 4, 6 & 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and they are behind the bars since 08.09.2025 & 17.09.2025 respectively. The other co- accused persons have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matters. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused- petitioners, namely Sagar Doltani Son Of Sri Hansanand Doltani & Pradeep Kumar Sharma Son Of Amarchandra Sharma, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the [2025:RJ-JP:51061] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13277/2025] sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /51-52