Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46918 (CHH)

ABHAY PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRCA/1703/2025 · 2025-11-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:54262 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1703 of 2025 • Abhay Pratap Singh S/o Hargovind Singh Aged About 26 Years R/o K-101/5, Jindal Road, Vrindavan Colony, Bhagwanpur, Police Station- Kotararoad, Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Applicant versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Station House Officer, Police Station- Bhupdevpur, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. Devesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Government Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 06/11/2025 1. This is Second Anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant under Section 482 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant of Anticipatory Bail, apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.48/2025 registered at Police Station – Bhupdevpur, District – Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 316(3) read with Section 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. The First anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant was VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.11.10 16:45:03 +0530 2 rejected by this Court in in MCRCA No.753 of 2025 vide order dated 20.05.2025. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that complainant lodged report before the concerned Police Station stating therein that present applicant alongwith other co-accused persons have prepared forged documents regarding entry of vehicle bearing registration No.CG-12- BG-9175, and thereby committed loss to the tune of Rs.21,41,024/- to the Company. Based upon report FIR was registered against the applicant and other co-accused persons. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that other co-accused persons have granted regular bail by this Court in MCRC No.5167 of 2025, MCRC No.6136 of 2025 and MCRC No.7513 of 2025, therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the present applicant. 5. On the other hand, learned State counsel, opposes the bail application and submits that first anticipatory bail application filed by the present applicant was rejected by this Court in MCRCA No.753 of 2025 vide order dated 20.05.2025. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, nature of offence and allegation levelled against the present applicant, considering the fact that first anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant was also rejected by this Court in MCRCA No.753 of 2025 3 vide order dated 20.05.2025, and no new ground has been raised in this bail application, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. 8. Accordingly, this first bail application of applicant – Abhay Pratap Singh, involved in Crime No.48/2025 registered at Police Station – Bhupdevpur, District – Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 316(3) read with Section 3(5) of BNS, 2023, is rejected at this stage. 9. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali