Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46915 (AP)

GANJI BHUSHNAM v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/27378/2025 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010476562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27378/2025 Between: 1. GANJI BHUSHNAM, S/O GANJI PARAMA JYOTHI,AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O,D/NO.6-6, PATHA AMBARUPETA, AMBERPETA, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU ELURU DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHIMADOLE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHIMADOLE POLICE STATION, BHIMADOLE ELURU DISTRICT 5. MALLULA SATYANARAYANA, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O, AMBERPETA VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. MALLULA KRISHNA, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/O, AMBERPETA VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT 7. MALLULA SURYANARYANA, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O, AMBERPETA VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL,E ELURU DISTRICT. 8. TADICHETTU VEERAMMA, W/O YEDUKONDALU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O AMBERPETA VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not conducting investigation and filing final report/charge sheet in Crime No. 283/2023 dated 07-12-2023, on the file of the Bhimadole Police Station, Bhimadole, Eluru District even after the lapse of 2 years as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 4th respondent to file final report/ charge sheet in the above crime.” 2. Heard Sri V.Sai Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is no progress in the investigation in Crime No.283 of 2023 on the file of Bhimadole Police Station. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the investigation in this matter is completed and the case is referred as false. 5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:08.10.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27378 of 2025 Dt.08.10.2025 Asr