RP 393 of 2025 IN OPKAT 512 of 2024 & C.M. Appln.No.1 of 2025 1 2025:KER:26870 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. KRISHNA KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 393 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.12.2024 IN OP(KAT) NO.512 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER : SUMAYYA A.P AGED 37 YEARS W/O HAMEED N.P, DARUSALAM UNNIKULAM P.O, KANTHAPURAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673572 BY ADVS. KIROSH RAJAN PONNAMBIL JOSEPH P P RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS : 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 RP 393 of 2025 IN OPKAT 512 of 2024 & C.M. Appln.No.1 of 2025 2 2025:KER:26870 3 THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 4 THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004 5 THE DISTRICT OFFICER KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673001 BY SRI.SUNILKUMAR KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, STANDING COUNSEL, KPSC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RP 393 of 2025 IN OPKAT 512 of 2024 & C.M. Appln.No.1 of 2025 3 2025:KER:26870 O R D E R A.Muhamed Mustaque, J. This review is at the instance of the petitioner in OP(KAT)No.512 of 2024. The petitioner submits that the ratio was not followed, resulting in non-reporting of vacancies. It is further submitted that, in the light of Annexure A3(a), the vacancies that were reported and later cancelled ought to have been taken into account for consideration of the issue in this matter. We note that, the petitioner is only a candidate from the ranked list. After adverting to the statement and noting that there were no vacancies, we dismissed the original petition on 17.12.2024. We cannot now exercise the power of review to reopen the entire issue for rehearing the matter. There is no error apparent in the judgment in OP(KAT)No.512 of 2014. Accordingly, this review petition stands dismissed, along with an application to condone the delay. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE Sd/- P.KRISHNA KUMAR JUDGE rkj