Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46905 (RAJ)

SMT. CHETANA KUMARI W/O BRIJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/8300/2024 · 2025-11-11

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45216] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8300/2024 Smt. Chetana Kumari W/o Brijesh Kumar, R/o 69, Ramdev Nagr, Niwaru, P.s. Kardhani, Jhotwara, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur. 4. S.h.o., Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur (West). 5. Rajani W/o Shri Khem Singh, R/o 4, Ramdev Nagar, Ni- waru, P.s. Kardhani, Jhotwara, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vijay Punia For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Kumar Gupta, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 11/11/2025 1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No.1031/2024 registered with Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur (West). 2. As per the pleadings of the misc. petition that the FIR was registered against the accused person on 21.09.2024, but the Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation. [2025:RJ-JP:45216] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8300/2024] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will take its own time & motion, so directions sought for should not be granted. 4. Looking to the fact that the FIR has been registered in the month of September, 2024, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation. 5. In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the court concerned strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /10