MADAN YADAV v. THE VICE CHANCELLOR OF CENTRAL UNIVERSITY AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/5165/2025 · 2025-07-07
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107594 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5165 of 2025 Petitioner :- Madan Yadav Respondent :- The Vice Chancellor Of Central University And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Tiwari,Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Lal,Diptiman Singh Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:-
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing of the impugned suspension order dated 18.12.2021 (Annexure no.1 to the writ petition). ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents department to permit the petitioner to resume his duty as usual on the post of Assistant Professor in the college and also pay him salary month-to-month as and when it become due with all consequential benefits."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after arguing at some length, without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that his representation dated 13.07.2023, which is pending before respondent no.2-The Chairperson of Governing Body of C.M.P. Degree College, Prayagraj, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3 vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard Sri S.K. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, Sri Ashok Kumar Lal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3, I am of the view that respondent no.2, the Chairperson of Governing Body of C.M.P. Degree College, Prayagraj, is
directed to decide the said representation dated 13.07.2023, which is pending before him, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from today.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad