Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46903 (AP)

BONTHU SUNIL KUMAR v. THE SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE

WP/14605/2023 · 2025-12-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010283502023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14605 OF 2023 Between: 1. BONTHU SUNIL KUMAR, S/o B.Suresh Kumar, aged about 27 years, presently residing at Sattenapalli Road, Dharanikota, Amaravathi, having permanent address at 3-14-49/A, Shakti Sai, Mallapur, Rangareddi, Andhra Pradesh - 500076 2. B.Suresh Kumar,, S/o B.Nageswara Rao, aged about 56 years, 3-14-49/A, Shakti Sai, Mallapur, Rangareddi, Andhra Pradesh - 500076 3. B.KalpanaKumari,, W/o B.Suresh Kumar, aged about 47 years, 3-14-49/A, Shakti Sai, Mallapur, Rangareddi, Andhra Pradesh - 500076 ...Petitioners AND 1. THE SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE, Palnadu District, District Police Office, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh - 522601 2. The Subinspector of Police, Pedakurapadu Police Station, Pedakurapadu, Andhra Pradesh - 522402 3. Station Writer, Pedakurapadu Police Station, Pedakurapadu, Andhra Pradesh - 522402 4. Vadlamudi Priyanka, D/o V.Jagaiah, Near RCM Church, Jalalapuram village, Pedakurapadu Mandal, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh -522436 5. VadlamudiJagaiah, Father's name not known to the Petitioner's, Beside Water Tank, Jalalapuram, Pedakurapadu Mandal, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh - 522436 6. Sobharani, W/o V.Jagaiah, Near RCM Church, Jalalapuram village, Pedakurapadu Mandal, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh - 522436 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tobe pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus. a. declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in illegally detaining the Petitioners in the custody of the 2nd Respondent and highhandedly forcing the Petitioners herein against their willingness to sign AngikaraPatram dated 16.06.2023 styled as a contract to marry the 4th Respondent by the 1st Petitioners illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice, and further direct the 2nd Respondent not to interfere in the matters of civil nature and pass any such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case. b). b). directing the 2nd Respondent to produce before this Hon'ble Court the AngikaraPatram dated 16.06.2023 styled as a contract to marry the 4th Respondent on which the Respondents forcefully took the signatures of the Petitioners against their willingness and to destroy the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pass an Order directing the Respondents not to take any coercive steps against the Petitioners and/or his family, including the arrest and/or appearance of the Petitioners, pending disposal of the instant Writ Petition, and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pass an Order directing the 2nd Respondent to produce before this Hon'ble Court the `AngikaraPatram' dated 16.06.2023 styled as a contract to marry the 4th Respondent on which the Respondents forcefully took the signatures of the Petitioners against their willingness and to keep it in safe custody of this Hon'ble Court, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioners: LAKSHMINARAYANA V Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:14605 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus. a. declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in illegally detaining the Petitioners in the custody of the 2nd Respondent and highhandedly forcing the Petitioners herein against their willingness to sign AngikaraPatram dated 16.06.2023 styled as a contract to marry the 4th Respondent by the 1st Petitioners illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice, and further direct the 2nd Respondent not to interfere in the matters of civil nature and pass any such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case. b). directing the 2nd Respondent to produce before this Hon'ble Court the AngikaraPatram dated 16.06.2023 styled as a contract to marry the 4th Respondent on which the Respondents forcefully took the signatures of the Petitioners against their willingness and to destroy the same and pass…= 2. Heard Sri Lakshminarayana V, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.12.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:14605 of 2023 Dated 10.12.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P. No. 14605 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 04. 10.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (vide separate order). ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV