26.02.2025. Court No. 13 Sl. No. 5 pk CPAN 1789 of 2024 In WPA 14124 of 2024 Sulekha Maity Versus Randhir Kumar and others Mr. Subhrangsu Panda, Ms. B. Pramanick, Mr. Ratul Ghosal ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Mr. Nilay Baran Mondal, …for the contemnor no.1. 1. It is submitted by the learned advocates for the parties the order-in-question has been complied with. 2. Mr. Panda, learned advocate for the petitioner disputes the commencement date of pension. 3. The same constitutes a fresh cause of action which will be agitated in the independent proceeding. 4. In view of the above, the contempt application is disposed of. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)