Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46899 (KAR)

SMT RENUKAVVA W/O BASANAGOUDA v. SMT HANUMAWWA W/O RAMANNA

MSA/100117/2022 · 2025-01-23

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MSA NO.100117 OF 2022 BETWEEN SMT RENUKAVVA W/O BASANAGOUDA AGE 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICUTLURE, R/O. HYATI, POST MUDDABALLI, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL 583239 AND OTHERS. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B.C.JNANAYYA SWAMI, ADVOCATES) AND SMT HANUMAWWA W/O RAMANNA AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HYATI, POST MUDDABALLI, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL 583239 AND OTHERS. …RESPONDENTS MSA FILED U/SEC.43 RULE 1 (U) OF CPC, PRAYING THAT AFTER CALLING FOR THE RECORDS AND PROCEEDS OF THE CASE THIS HONBLE COURT BE PLEASE TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.02.2022 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KOPPAL, IN RA NO. 10/2022 AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.07.2013 2 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE KOPPAL IN OS NO. 8/2012 MAY KINDLY BE CONFIRMED , BY ALLOWING THIS MSA WITH COSTS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS MATTER COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE Note As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 25.02.2025, the Advocate for the Appellant has not complied office objection. Hence, this above matter stands dismissed without reference to the Court as per the Court Order dated:23.01.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: cmu C- By: sgs