Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
RSA NO. 100792/2023
BETWEEN
1 . BHIMAVVA AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. DORI, TQ.DIST. DHARWAD-581103.
2 .
KEDARI S/O. RUDRAPPA TOPANNAVAR AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. DORI, TQ.DIST. DHARWAD-581103.
3 .
KAVITA D/O. RUDRAPPA TOPANNAVAR AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT R/O. DORI, TQ.DIST. DHARWAD-581103.
4 .
SAVITA D/O. RUDRAPPA TOPANNAVAR AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT R/O. DORI, TQ. DIST. DHARWAD-581103.
SINCE MINOR R/BY NATURAL MINOR GUARDIAN MOTHER BHIMAVVA APPELLANT NO.1 HEREIN ...APPELLANTS (By SRI: A C CHAKALABBI and ASSOCIATES)
2 AND
SMT. RUDRAWWA W/O BABU HAIBATTI SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
1.
SHIVANAND S/O. BABU HAIBATTI AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. KADROLLI VILLAGE, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI-591153.
2.
SMT. YALLAWWA W/O. VITHAL BAILUR AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: NIL R/O. DORI, TQ.DIST. DHARWAD-581103..
3.
SRI. VITHAL S/O. JAYAPPA BAILUR AGE: 72 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. DORI, TQ.DIST. DHARWAD-581103.
4.
SMT. FAKIRAWWA W/O. RUDRAPPA TOPANNAVAR AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: NIL R/O. DORI, TQ.DIST. DHARWAD-581103.
5.
SRI. PANDU S/O. JAYAPPA BAILUR AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE R/O. DORI, TQ.DIST. DHARWAD-581103. …RESPONDENTS
RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO, I. ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.06.2023 IN R.A.NO. 92/2023 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DHARWAD AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS., DHARWAD ON 25.02.2017 IN O.S.NO.478/2011.
3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
O R D E R Four weeks’ time is granted to remove the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to Bench. SD/- JUDGE
Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 06.06.2025. Advocate for the appellants has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 100792/2023 stands dismissed without reference to Bench as per the Court Order dated 22.04.2025.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
R- By:-
C- By:-vk T- By: -vg