SUSHILCHAND MUNDRA S/O LATE SHANKERLAL MUNDRA v. SMT. VANDANA JAIN W/O NAVEEN KUMAR JAIN
CW/11687/2025 · 2025-12-18
Bipin Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46893 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46893 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51115] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11687/2025
1. Sushilchand Mundra S/o Late Shankerlal Mundra, Resident Of Property No. 14/188 Old, Khatola Pol, Ajmer
2. Harishankar Alias Harishchand S/o Late Shankerlal Mundra, Resident Of Property No. 14/188 Old, Khatola Pol, Ajmer
3. Smt. Usha W/o Madangapal D/o Late Shankerlal Mundra, Resident Of Property No. 14/188 Old, Khatola Pol, Ajmer
4. Smt. Manju W/o Dinesh Chand D/o Late Shankerlal Mundra, Resident Of Property No. 14/188 Old, Khatola Pol, Ajmer
5. Smt. Suman W/o Rajendra Maheshwari D/o Late Shankerlal Mundra, Resident Of Property No. 14/188 Old, Khatola Pol, Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Smt. Vandana Jain W/o Naveen Kumar Jain, (Since Deceased, Through Legal Heirs) 1/1. Nitin Alias Vineet S/o Naveen Kumar Jain, Resident Of Lane No.3, Sundar Vilas, Ajmer 1/2. Siddharth Jain S/o Naveen Kumar Jain, Resident Of Lane No.3, Sundar Vilas, Ajmer 1/3. Dhananjay Jain S/o Naveen Kumar Jain, Resident Of Lane No.3, Sundar Vilas, Ajmer 1/4. Naveen Kumar Jain S/o Kapoorchand Jain, Resident Of Lane No.3, Sundar Vilas, Ajmer
2. Smt. Bela Jain W/o Praveen Kumar Jain, R/o Lane No. 3, Sundar Vilas, Ajmer
3. Rameshwari Devi W/o Jagdish Prasad D/o Late Shankerlal Mundra, R/o Khatola Pol, Ajmer
4. Smt. Sushila W/o Omprakash D/o Late Shankerlal Mundra, R/o Property No. 14/188 Old, Khatola Pol, Ajmer ----Respondents For petitioner(s) : Mr. Ridhvick Dosi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Divyansh Jain with Ms. Abhilasha Sharma
[2025:RJ-JP:51115] (2 of 3) [CW-11687/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 18/12/2025
1. The present writ petition is not being pressed by learned counsel for the petitioners, with a prayer that reasonable time be granted to them to vacate the premises.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents, upon instructions from his client, submits that he has no objection, if the time prayed for by the petitioners to vacate the tenanted premises, is granted.
3. With the consent of the parties, the petitioners are granted one year’s time to vacate the premises, on the following consented terms: (i). The petitioners shall vacate the premises on or before
18.12.2026. (ii). The petitioners shall pay all arrears of rent, as per the decree, within a period of four weeks. (iii). The petitioners undertake to pay mesne profit at the rate of Rs. 10,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.01.2026. (iv). The petitioners are directed to file an undertaking before the learned Rent Tribunal, to the effect that they shall vacate the premises, on or before 18.12.2026, and shall continue to pay mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 10,000/-, per month till vacation of the premises, and shall not sub-let or create any alteration in the disputed premises. (v). The mesne profits payable from 01.01.2026, shall be paid by the petitioners by the 15th day of the succeeding month. In case of default for three consecutive months in payment of the
[2025:RJ-JP:51115] (3 of 3) [CW-11687/2025] mesne profits, then the respondents shall be entitled to seek execution for the decree. (vi). If the order passed by this Court is not complied with by the petitioners, then they shall be liable for contempt of Court proceedings.
4. With the above observations, the present Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of.
5. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J PARSHANT /1