RSA-3620- IN THE HIG 234-A Punjab State Gurmail Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby the appellants w 2. appeal is yet the inception times, out 06.05.2025 ( non-appeara an adjournm which is not 3. have exhibit -2018 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o State Warehousing Corporation Ltd. Versus ail Singh M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Ms. Deepika, Advocate for Mr. Karan Singla, Advocate for Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant/plaintiffs are in s rrent judgments and decrees rendered by the suit for recovery of an amoun ants was dismissed. The matter pertains to the year l is yet to be issued. Perusal of the ord ception of the present appeal, the same out of which on 03 dates i.e. 2025 (last date of hearing), the same pearance on behalf of the appellants. T ournment has been made by learned is not justifiable. A bare reading of the above exhibited an utterly casual attitude in ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3620-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.02.2026 n Ltd. and another .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ate for the appellants. AAG, Punjab. in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts, mount of ₹11,17,782/- filed by the year 2018 and notice in the main he order-sheet(s) reveal(s) that since e same was listed for hearing for 04 i.e. 13.03.2019, 30.07.2019 and same was adjourned on account of lants. Today, yet another request for arned proxy counsel for appellants facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present the urts, the ain ince r 04 and t of t for ants sent RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.10 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-3620- litigation. It Court has be the interest o utterly casua nor their cou Thus, this Co non-prosecu 4. 5. 10.02.2026 rishu -2018 (O&M) -2- It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, t casual and careless approach. It is cl counsel are seriously interested in Court is left with no other option e rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellanst in and, the appellant have adopted an It is clear that neither the appellants sted in pursuing the present matter. ption except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the t in d an for RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.10 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.