Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46886 (AP)

SMT. RESAPU RAMALAKSHMI v. SRI RESAPU VENKATA SIVA HEMASUNDAR REDDY

FCA/166/2008 · 2025-09-23

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010506752008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 166/2008 Between: 1. SMT. RESAPU RAMALAKSHMI, W/O VENKATA SIVA HEMASUNDAR REDDY HOUSE WIFE R/O D.NO. 52-11-8, RESAPUVANIPALEM, VISAKHAPTNAM. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SRI RESAPU VENKATA SIVA HEMASUNDAR REDDY, S/o Seetharama Reddy R/o D.No. 52-11-8, Resapuvanipalem, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against ordersset aside the Decree and Order dated 5-12-2007 in OP.NO. 503 of 2005 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Visakhapatnam and consequently allow the appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 336 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 177 days in representing the above appeal in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2008(FCAMP 341 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Decree and Order dt. 05.12.2007 in O.P.503 of 2005 on the file of the Judge: Family Court at Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the Appeal 2 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N SURYA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GODA RAMALAKSHMI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.166 of 2008 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 13.08.2025, when this matter was listed, there was no representation on either side. Accordingly, this matter was posted to 03.09.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 10.09.2025, this matter was again listed. On that day also, there was no representation on either side. To give one more opportunity to the parties, it was posted to today. Today also, there is no representation on either side. Hence, it appears that the parties have no interest to prosecute the appeal. 2. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:24.09.2025 SCS 4 168 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.166 of 2008 Dt.24.09.2025 SCS