SAMEER SINGH RAWAT S/O LATE SHRI KALU SINGH RAWAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13242/2025 · 2025-12-16
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46884 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46884 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50820] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13242/2025 Sameer Singh Rawat S/o Late Shri Kalu Singh Rawat, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Near Bhairuji Temple Hathikhera, Police Station Haribhau Upadhyay Nagar District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 16/12/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.59/2025 registered at Police Station Haribhau Upadhyay Nagar, District Ajmer for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 108 & 79 of B.N.S.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and he is behind the bars since 20.06.2025. Counsel further submits that the petitioner had neither instigated nor abetted the deceased to commit suicide and initially, the father of the deceased submitted a written-report on 29.05.2024 at Police Station Haribhau Upadhyay Nagar, District Ajmer, wherein no allegations, whatsoever, were made against the petitioner. Subsequently, the present FIR came to be registered on
[2025:RJ-JP:50820] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13242/2025] 04.06.2024, after the delay of six days, which casts serious doubt on the prosecution version. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth, custody period of the petitioner and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Therefore,
the
bail
application
is allowed. Accused-petitioner, namely Sameer Singh Rawat S/o Late Shri Kalu Singh Rawat, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /83