Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4688 (JHR)

MANZOOR ANSARI ALIAS MD MANZOOR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./902/2025 · 2025-02-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.902 of 2025 ------ 1. Manzoor Ansari @ Md. Manzoor Ansari aged about 55 years S/O Late Tufani Miya 2. Shamim Ansari @ Guddu Ansari, aged about 29 years S/O Manzoor Ansari @ Md. Manzoor Ansari, both are R/O Village- Banwari, P.O.-Shiladih, P.S.-Gorhar, Dist.-Hazaribag (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Md. Ayub Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mr. V. S. Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 11-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Gorhar P.S. Case No.53 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/109/352/303(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant and her husband Sikandar Ansari. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that by learned counsel for the petitioners that the injury report submitted by the Doctor of Sheikh Bhikhari Medical College Hospital, Hazaribagh goes to show that same is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object. It is further submitted that petitioners had no intention to kill the informant and her husband. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail depositing Rs.5,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribag, in connection with Gorhar P.S. Case No.53 of 2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/