[2025:RJ-JP:48603] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. IInd Bail Application No. 12306/2025 Ravindra Kumar S/o Shri Ashvini Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 5, Gali No. 05, Lasuri Mohalla, Basti, Danishmanda, P.S. Basti, Bava Khel, District Jalandhar, (Punjab) (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Accused/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Chinmay Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 01/12/2025 1. The present second bail application has been filed by the accused-applicant. The first bail application filed on behalf of the accused-applicant has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 03.07.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.535/2025 and subsequently, evidence of some of the witnesses has been recorded. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant contends that the accused-applicant was arrested on 12.12.2024 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant further submits that the offences are triable by Magistrate, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor while vehemently opposing this bail application, submits that one more case is pending against the [2025:RJ-JP:48603] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12306/2025] accused-applicant and in the present bail application, the allegation against the accused-applicant is of committing cyber fraud by blocking mobile SIM of the complainant and thereafter, fraudulently made transaction of Rs.55 lacs out of the bank account of the complainant, therefore, considering the serious nature of the offence committed by the accused-applicant, the bail application be dismissed. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. The first bail application filed on behalf of the accused-applicant has been dismissed on merit by this Court vide order dated 03.07.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.535/2025 and since then, no material change in the facts and circumstances of the case has occurred except recording of evidence of 7 witnesses out of 11 witnesses. 6. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to allow the second bail application filed by the accused-applicant. 7. Accordingly, this second bail application filed by the accused-applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 is dismissed. Any pending application(s) also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /2