Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46876 (AP)

DR. G.S.R. SARMA, KRISHNA DIST v. PRL SECY, HEALTH, MEDICAL & FAMILY WELFARE DEPT. GUNTUR DIST

WP/931/2017 · 2025-07-03

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010588992017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 931 OF 2017 Between: Dr. G.S.R. SARMA, S/o. Viswanadha Sastry, aged 59 years, Professor and Head of the Department of Phisiology, Siddartha Medical College, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, Secretariat, Velagapudi/Amaravathi Guntur District 2. Dr NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Krishna District, rep. by its Registrar 3. Controller of Examinations, Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences Vijayawada, Krishna District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering and disposing of the representation dt. 18.11.2016 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith dispose of the said representation and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondents: TADDI NAGESWARA RAO (SC FOR DR NTR UHS A.P ) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW(AP) The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.931 of 2017 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following main relief: <Issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering and disposing of the representation dated 18.11.2016 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith dispose of the said representation and to pass …..= 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.T.V.Sridevi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent University jointly submit that in view of subsequent events in the lis, no cause survives for adjudication. While making the said submission, they further seek closure of the Writ Petition. 3. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 04.07.2025 Rns HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.931 of 2017 Date:04.07.2025 Rns